The Popliteal Artery is Safe in Medial Meniscal Repair Using All Inside Devices in Adults: An MRI-Based Simulation Study.

Introduction: This simulation study on MRI of the knee was performed to assess the risk of injury to the popliteal artery (PA) and common peroneal nerve (CPN) during all-inside meniscal repairs in adults. Methods: We simulated repair of the posterior horn of both medial (PHMM) and lateral menisci (PHLM) through anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) portals, using straight and curved devices, on 200 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans taken with the knee in extension. For simulation using straight devices, the shortest distance from the menisco-capsular junction (MCJ) and the free edge of the meniscus to PA and CPN in vectors of AM and AL portals was measured. In curved devices, the closest extracapsular distance from the device tip to PA was measured. Results: With a straight device through AM portal, the mean distance from the MCJ of PHMM to the PA was 20.7 ± 3.15 mm (13.5-27.4). In PHMM repair through AM portal using a curved device, the mean extracapsular distance from the device tip to PA was 18.8 ± 4 mm (7.7-27.2) while pointing toward and 26 ± 4.5 mm (15.5-35.6) while pointing away from the midline. When using straight devices, the average distance from free edge of LM to PA was 18.5 ± 3.3 mm (9.6-31.2) and from MCJ to PA was 8.9 ± 2.4 mm (3.5-18.8). The average distance measured from the MCJ to CPN through AM and AL portals using straight devices was 19.4 ± 2.8 mm (10.2-32.5) and 22 ± 2.8 mm (10.4-36.7) respectively. Conclusion: In adults, PA is safe in PHMM repairs using both straight and curved devices irrespective of depth and direction of insertion. In PHLM repairs, the PA is at risk with both straight and curved devices. We recommend adjusting the depth of insertion to as minimum as possible to just penetrate the capsule. The CPN is safe in LM repairs using all-inside devices. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Spinal Intramedullary Tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis of the central nervous system accounts for approximately 1% of all cases of tuberculosis and 50% of these involve the spine. Intramedullary involvement is rare in tuberculosis. Clinical presentation of spinal intramedullary tuberculosis (SIMT) is similar to intramedullary spinal cord tumor. Here, we report the case of a 49-year-old female with dull aching pain of both upper limbs of 1-week duration. On examination, she had no motor deficits. All the deep tendon reflexes were normal. The plantar responses were flexor bilaterally. Cervical spine imaging favored intramedullary tumor. She had partial relief of symptoms with steroid treatment. Repeat imaging done 1 month later revealed mild interval enlargement of the intramedullary lesions and multiple enlarged mediastinal and hilar nodes. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of mediastinal nodes was suggestive of granulomatous inflammation. Hence, SIMT was considered as the probable diagnosis. The patient was started on antituberculosis therapy.